| |










 |
|

It
has been described by some as Braveheart meets Ben Hur.
Well, comparing Gladiator to Braveheart is like comparing
baseball to football: just because theres a ball
involved doesn'tt mean the two are alike. I think
that the only similarity the two films have in common is
that both films are entertaining.
The basic plot of Gladiator runs as follows: After
defeating the Germans in battle, General Maximus (Russell
Crowe) is offered the position of Caesar by the ailing
patriarch Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris). The Caesar
knows that Maximus is kind and just, the type of man who
could restore power to the Senate and bring about the end
of corruption within the empire. Then, on the other hand,
there is Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix), Marcus son and
current heir to the throne. Commodus is the
anti-thesis of Maximus, possessing all the ill traits
that will only take the empire further on the downward
spiral. Marcus tells his son of his plan to give power to
Maximus, and Commodus kills him in a jealous rage. He
then orders Maximus and his family killed. Maximus
eventually escapes, unable to save his family, however,
and vows revenge. Taken as a slave, he is forced to fight
in the Gladiator ring, but as the bodies pile up, and his
legend grows, Maximus decides to use his political
leverage to topple the government.
Now, if youre looking for a no-holds barred action
extravaganza, you may be disappointed. Gladiator leans
towards the dramatic, rather than the melodramatic.
Personally, it wasnt as good as I thought it would
be, but it was good nonetheless. I wasnt too keen
on the choreography and camera direction during action
scenes. During many fight sequences, the camera is moving
all over the place without focusing on anything in
particular, so you dont get to see extreme graphic
detail. This is how the large scale battle sequences
differ from Braveheart. In the latter, there is an equal
mix of camera motion, intercut with extremely graphic
scenes of heads getting splattered by sledgehammers,
shorn appendages, and rolling heads. Gladiator, however,
rarely displays such a liberal attitude towards carnage.
In fact, much of the violence is hinted at, rather than
shownbut there is quite a bit of violence, so its
all a matter of asthetics really. I prefer to know
exactly what is going on, who is killing who, and how
they are getting killed, so it did get a little
frustrating.
As usual, Russell Crowe gives a convincing performance as
Maximus, described in the screenplay as having "a face that is
like the map of a soldiers hard life", he both looks the part,
and carries the quiet charisma of a born leader. Russell Crowe
is such a diverse actor that you may have seen him in an earlier
role and never knew it was him. After waching Gladiator, I
couldn't imagine a better person for the role. As others
before me have said--Russell Crowe IS Maximus.
Also, Joaquin Phoenix is one hell of an actor, and I don't
think it will be too hard for him to escape from his brothers
shadow. His performance is so good that at times you actually
feel sorry for Commodus--he is just a young man, scared and
jealous, unable to win the love of the people of Rome. I think
Joaquin will probably have a few movie offers after this one.
Also, his black chest carapace was probably one of the coolest
pieces of armor in the film (next to Maximus armor in the
opening scene).
One gripe of mine is that they shouldnt have made
it look so melodramatic in the previews. Gladiator could
have been a more entertaining film if they had made it a
melodrama. I mean, lets face ityou dont go
and see a film called Gladiator because you want to see
tragic plot development. It seems lately that action
films dont follow the formula that was so
successful in the eighties and early nineties. How long
has it been since a good action flick like Die Hard,
Terminator 2, or Last of the Mohicans has graced the
silver screen? Too long.
The scenery, props, and costumes used in Gladiator are
very cool. The acting is sound. The CGI work is also
good. I didnt like the ending though, and I thought
the action of the final fight scene was pretty limp Also,
the plot could have used a little work. On the whole,
Gladiator is worth the six bucks.

Related
Links:

|
|
 A
hero will rise.

![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/may/gladiator01.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/may/gladiator02.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/may/gladiator03.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/may/gladiator04.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/may/gladiator05.jpg)

|