UGO

 

Home
Box Office
Movie Reviews
Trailers
Movie News
Movie Posters
Movie Section
Movie Articles
Movie Scripts
Message Board
Chat
Win An Award
FAQ
Links
Contact Us
 

Goodbye, 20th Century


Image

A film review by Mark O'Hara
Copyright © 1999
Mark O'Hara

Image
Image
Image

It's hard to categorize the film "Goodbye, 20th Century" out of the Republic of Macedonia. In the literature created for its publicity it purports to be science fiction. I'd disagree, reasoning that there are guns and black clothing, yes, but no science to speak of. It might make a legitimate claim at being fantasy, but after all is viewed, it is merely a failed attempt at too many things.

The film starts by making us watch a troupe of people toting many weapons and their leather clothing through a moonscape, apparently mountains in the Balkans. Some of the camera work is interesting, low angles of the hikers leaning into the enormous slag-heap. Then some kind of Christian ceremony is held, the most menacing man in the group praying. Suddenly Kuzman (Nikola Ristanovski), clearly intended to be a Christ figure, gets himself into further trouble by parading around with a little girl's parasol. Later we discover his claim that he had sex with a saint, and that the saint had taken revenge by causing most of the children to die. Hence the scene atop the rock-strewn hill wherein Kuzman is actually shot by his fellow travelers. They rake him over good with the sub-machine guns and large caliber pistols. The only problem is he cannot even die to rid himself of the apparent misery his life has become. He keeps twitching or opening his eyes or raising a claw-like hand - movements that invite only more fusillades of lead.

What began to concern me while I watched "Goodbye, 20th Century" was that this confusing opening sequence was probably the closest the film would come to having a plot. In the threadbare events involving Kuzman, we see him half wrapped in a shroud in a mysterious woman's hovel; he sits in a tub that appears to have chunks of vapor-causing dry ice in the water. Soon the woman dumps a bushel of hard, apple-like fruit into the tub with him, and disrobes herself. Unembarrassed by her tattooed body, she climbs into the tub and lets him have sex with her. This is the most graphic scene in the film: a resurrected corpse copulating in a claw-footed tub with a woman who is silent and graffiti-covered.

But the violent scenes reach a higher peak of sickness. A man dressed as Santa Claus (Lazar Ristovski) apparently returns home to find a group of mourners in his living room. We suppose they are mourning as there is a photo of the deceased ( a soldier), and the furniture is draped in white. In the next room there is a reappearing character, a prophet who poses as a barber. (Earlier he taunts Kuzman and receives a bloody lip for his trouble.) Oh, I forgot to mention that the filmmakers (Aleksander Popovski and Darko Mitrevski) have set this scene on the last day of 1999, close to midnight. As the turn of the millenium approaches, the characters gathered in the room commence to engage in increasingly perverted behaviors. One man's hand catches fire; he later uses the damaged hand, seemingly without pain, to punch out the defrocked Santa Claus. A woman lets Santa ride atop her shoulders, her face buried in his crotch, as he attempts to rescue a beret that one of two unruly children in the room has tossed on the star topping the tree. Another woman, dressed provocatively, cavorts around laughing and licks the face of the man with the singed hand.

What all this adds up to is a random collection of violent and lascivious acts, unleavened by any coherent narrative links. Viewing it was like watching longish clips from music videos, unrelated scenes showing the basest of human behaviors. What is so objectionable about the violent scenes is not just that they are graphic, that they were designed to be enjoyed, but that they have no discernible purpose or point. The entire film seems based on an idea of imminent apocalypse, but we never see the Armageddon that caused the aftermath of the beginning scene, which is set in 2019. The filmmakers' attempt to take risks with further time-hopping also fails. In a grainy clip supposedly set at the turn of the last century, we see a hastily explained example of incestuous love, a brother proposing marriage to his sister. Suddenly the brother is maneuvered to the side and shot. (The cameraman is the barber, by the way.) What we have witnessed, we are told, is the first sin of this century. Aha, an attempt to suggest that the sins of the fathers are visited upon the sons? Hogwash.

Thankfully, the film occupies just over an hour. It was a pleasant surprise to see it end.

----- Line ------

Related Links:

----- Line ------

Copyright © 1997/99 Bjørn Erik Hundland. All rights reserved.
Best viewed with IE 5.0 and/or Netscape 4.0. - Contact
Movie-Page.com.
Original Movie-Page Design By
Web Byrået Turbin as. Hosted by Digiweb.