| |










 |
|

This
summer offering from director Paul Verhoeven (STARSHIP
TROOPERS, ROBOCOP) is a science fiction thriller that
blends an old story with very new special effects. At its
best, HOLLOW MAN highlights all of the unsavory
implications of invisibility; at its worst, it panders to
some of the baser requirements of modern movie-goers.
H.G. Wells novel THE INVISIBLE MAN is invoked
continuously in HOLLOW MAN. The story is by Gary Scott
Thompson, the screenplay by Thompson and Andrew W.
Marlowe. But Wellsian influence is what really drives the
story. What happens when a scientific genius (in this
update its Sebastian Caine, played by Kevin Bacon)
creates the means by which to make himself invisible?
Caine goes through the whole routine, only what hes
after is cracking the key to becoming visible again. When
his team of brilliant assistants helps him bring back to
visibility a large primate (gorilla), Caine volunteers
himself as the first human to be injected with the
top-secret serum that will make him unseen.
Thinking back to Wells story, viewers will remember
Claude Rains character going crazy after becoming
invisible. Caine does the same. In fact, the filmmakers
add a good deal of foreshadowing to get us to believe
Caine is capable of doing what he does in the final acts
of the story. One problem is that Caine is somewhat of a
creep to begin with: he has been jilted by his right-hand
colleague Linda Foster (Elisabeth Shue), and he flashes
several signs of jealousy when he learns she has another
man. So we dont really feel close to Caine at any
time. Heres a paradox viewers would be
struck by the tragedy of the grotesque downfall of a man
they admired, but perhaps for the purposes of modern
thrillers, it is better to despise the fallen hero from
the start. Of course when Caine discovers the identity of
Dr. Fosters new lover, he slides even more deeply
into a dark envy followed by a plummet into psychotic
behavior.
Heres the rub. Watching, I was bothered not so much
by my lack of empathy for Caine it is easier,
after all, to hate a non-human bogeyman, which the insane
scientist clearly becomes, by turns ghost-like and
grotesque. What struck me was the pattern the story
follows: think of any hard-to-kill monster from the last
twenty years of cinema. HOLLOW MAN could be traced even
to one film, Ridley Scotts ALIEN, with Caine as the
critter and Shue as Ripley. Im afraid not even the
slick effects can offset the sour taste of derivative
storyline.
One thing that could have added comic relief to HOLLOW
MAN is more harmless pranks. Couldnt Caine have
cavorted around out in the world like Rains did when he
terrorized the townspeople? Here we witness simple
terrorizing and worse. (This does not include little
touches on the hair and Caines moving around
Fosters can of Coca-Cola.) The last word is that
the films outlook on humanity is bleak: one of the
researchers announces early, assuming a God-like voice,
that the project is doomed, the scientists cursed
tampering with Creation.
The story does do a nice job of exposing the implications
of invisibility, though. The characters on Caines
team display constant paranoia and finally, dread. This
invisible fiend even has an advantage over a housefly,
which cannot see the hand about to squash it.
The coolest aspect of the film is the effects, which
receive at least equal billing with the human stars. But
heres a question posed by contemporary
bio-ethicists everywhere: Just because we can, does
that mean we should? Just because effects
far-outdistance the reality of the effects of movies
years ago, it doesnt mean the movies are any
better. Plainly, the film relies too heavily on
computer-assisted magic.
The acting is as good as the story permits it to be.
Kevin Bacon is one of our finest actors, but he should
probably talk with Tom Hanks about gaining a knack for
spotting just the right script. Bacon is capable of
showing more humanity than he is allowed to show here.
Caine seems an egomaniacal, brooding jerk. Elisabeth Shue
(whose name appears first at films start, by the
way) is very capable here, too, though she has to repeat
too many times that there were reasons she broke up with
Caine what they are is a mystery, however.
In the theater I was reminded that American viewers get
what they want. No lecture here, but for my tastes,
HOLLOW MAN shows too much violence, and even exhibits
partially nude women being abused by Caine. Sure, the
ending is pleasing if typical, but ultimately its
the kind of film that does not make you feel very good
over spending the time to watch it.

Related
Links:

|
|
 There's
more to fear than you can see.

![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/aug/hollowman01.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/aug/hollowman02.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/aug/hollowman03.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/aug/hollowman04.jpg)

|