| |










 |
|

Style,
Style, Style! Its what vampire films are all about.
With the right director at the helm you could have a
classic film, maybe about some teen vampire hunters in
the 80s, or perhaps a tale of a vampire's inner
struggle with taking life, heck you could even go as far
as making another incarnation of the Bram Stoker original.
Now does "Queen of the Damned" have style? Sure
it has plenty of style, most of it being placed in the
rock star angle that the Vampire Lestat takes on in his
second Hollywood incarnation. The bigger question in this
case would be, was the rock star angle enough to save a
film that was lacking in so many other places?
It really is hard to follow up a film, when you have none
of the original cast, and not a trace of the original
story to be seen. Which will be its downfall from the
start, you have Stuart Townsend playing the role of
Lestat this time around, filling the $20 million shoes of
Mr. Tom Cruise. Fans of both film and book alike will
notice right off that Townsend despite having the vampire
look down quite well, has no attributes whatsoever
commonly known in Lestat. He doesnt have the golden
locks of hair, instead he has a dirty blond look that
looks almost black through the darkness of the film. Hes
also a bit too innocent for the role, throughout the film
he seems to be everyones bitch,
except to the lesser vampires who look like they all came
out of a SlipKnoT concert.
Another aspect that will mortify the book reading crowd,
is the severe changes made from the book. No doubt
attributed to the fact that they combine two novels,
"The Vampire Lestat" and "Queen of the
Damned." The first change that almost made me walk
out was the fact that Lestats maker has been
changed for the studio's convenience no doubt. Instead of
receiving his dark gifts from the little known Magnus,
they have melded in his character with Marius, who was a
mentor to Lestat later on in his years.
A lot of the other changes are mostly a fault in
direction. They didnt seem to want to delve into
what makes these characters tick. Which is a shame
considering Anne Rice has been developing the lives of
these immortals for decades now. The director seemed to
want to introduce every aspect in the story and get it
over with as soon as possible. Even the title character
is rushed. Its a basic shes here, shes
evil, lets kill her, and bickety bam, its
over. Granted giving Aaliyah as little time on screen as
possible was a good move. There are many aspects that
were very rushed, and left me very dissatisfied.
Further into the direction you also begin to notice it
lacks the mood that worked so well in "Interview
with the Vampire." Visually it wasnt
impressive at all, even the special effect in the one big
30 second fight scene was plagued by horrible cuts into
the crowd, and these terrible computer generated motion
blurs. Lets not forget all the oral prosthetics
seem to have come from the early 1800s. They seemed
very unnatural, and filled the characters mouths in a way
that just made it look like a B-Movie.
As for the acting, it was only as bad as the script. You
know a film's in trouble, when you have Akasha Queen of
all vampires, ancient Egyptian, spouting phrases like
We have a score to settle. Hell and shes
the title character, so you can only guess the kind of B-Movie
lines that the rest of the cast is spouting out. Overall,
not even Stuart Townsends performance (while not up
to par with Cruise was done was well as the script will
allow) could not save the film.
The real honors of this film should be given to the lead
singer of KoRn, who actually showed Townsend how to
become a rock star. Not to mention lent his vocal talents
for all the singing parts in the actual film. Sadly
enough you wont find him singing the songs on the
soundtrack. Hes been replaced by a few familiar
faces in the hard rock world. I guess I should also give
credit to Aussie director Paul Goldman who directed the
music videos for the fictional band. The direction in
those videos was actually superb, and may be the only
reason to pick up this DVD in the future. That is if they
are smart enough to add the music videos into the DVD
release. Overall youre better off waiting for the
DVD either way.

Related
Links:

Copyright ©
1997-2003 Bjørn
Erik Hundland. All rights reserved.
Film related properties mentioned herein are ©
to their respective owners. Best viewed at 800x600
with IE and/or Netscape. Hosted by Digiweb Norge. |
|
|
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2002/qotd01.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2002/qotd02.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2002/qotd03.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2002/qotd04.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2002/qotd05.jpg)

|