| |










 |
|

[Major
spoilers included.]
When
I heard that they were remaking the movie Shaft, I didn't
think they we're going to make it as cheesy as the
original, nor as preposterous or racially motivated.
Let's have a quick socio-political recap of the original:
In the seventies, a majority of the action films were
geared towards the white audience, with little attention
paid to other ethnic groups. The original Shaft was a
landmark film that took all the elements of the white
hero flick, and simply exchanged all the main characters
with black actors. Thus the roles were reversed, with the
bumbling white officers "trying to keep the
brotherman down" while pandering to the ultra-cool
of John Shaft, "the big black private dick who's a
sex machine to all the chicks".
Now, leap forward twenty-five years into the future. It's
the year 2000. The standards have changed. In this day
and age, nobody cares if the hero is black or white, as
long as he can kick-ass. Wesley Snipes' "Blade"
for example, Lawrence Fishburn's "Morpheus",
Will Smiths "Agent Jay", all of these
characters have transcended, or rather surpassed, the
banality of racial injustice as a driving force for
vengence. They are not "black heroes" they are
simply "heroes". So why does our new Shaft feel
the need to rehash this political plotline inherent in
the original and since then almost completely wiped away
from the action genre altogether? As I've said, times
have changed, racial tension is no longer a one sided
manifestation that we can blame on any one ethnic group.
In this day and age anyone and everyone can be a racist,
which brings me to my first problem with todays Shaft....
A black man is killed for being black--thus Shaft kicks
into action. He is, and always will be a peoples
champ--it is the fundamental core of Shaft's persona.
However, later on in the film, Shaft himself reveals his
own racial indifference to whites by joking with his
partner and saying "You know you're still a cracker
motherf---er, right?" To which his partner replies
"Sure, cornbread." or something to that extent.
Immediately we have a problem because Shaft himself is a
racist and a hippocrit. So, how in the hell can we as an
audience find justification in his fight for racial
equality? He isn't fighting for the betterment of
society, he's simply waged his own personal vandetta
against anyone who doesn't like black people. Okay,
here's my next problem....
Christian Bale plays--who I initially assumed to be--the
bad guy. Dispite my negative reviews of
"American
Psycho" I do like him as an actor. In Shaft, his
character is a stereotypical upperclass whiteboy, whining,
snobbish and constantly throwing temper tantrums. In the
opening scenes, he kills a black man by clubbing him over the
head with a steel banister after being humiliated in a
bar. We hate him at first because he is a racist,
provoking an innocent black man, calling him names and
trying to embarrass him. We think, he deserves whatever
he gets, and we cheer Shaft when he clocks Bale in the
chin for his callous and almost Edward Norton-esque
disregard for the life that he has just taken. However,
Bale is next in jail and accosted for his shoes by a
large black man. Bale beats up the would be assailant and
keeps his shoes. Later, Bale is walking down the street
when two large men provoke him, making fun of his skin
color and threatening him for the sheer pleasure of it,
he is mugged by Shaft, stabbed in the hand by the films
second baddie, and basically has a crappy time for the
rest of the movies duration. The point is, we actually
feel sorry for him by the time the movie is over with,
because we begin to understand why he has become a
racist--it is the American History X phoenomenon all over
again. The number one rule when writing and making an
action film is this--the bad guy is not the
victim...ever!!! The baddie is active, the hero is
reactive. He is the predator, not the prey, that's why
were supposed to hate him. The moment he looses that
edge, he becomes human in our eyes, and we normally feel
sorry for humans, we don't feel sorry for bad guys.
Okay, enough with the racial undercurrents, let's just
talk about the film. The dialogue sucks, with the only
witty repoitoire being Shaft's response to a woman asking
him for a quick romp. "It's my duty, to please that
booty" is perhaps the only memorable line in the
film. Other than that, the only wordplay in the whole
movie deals with how many different variants of cuss
words the characters can throw into a sentence. The word
"shit" becomes a verb, an adjective, a noun, a
preposition, and the catalyst for much of the dialogue.
The action scenes are non-existant, in fact, the preview
with Sam Jackson walking back and forth in Armani leather
taking off his sunglasses every five seconds was more
exciting and actually had more plot structure.
The second baddie in the film named Peoples, was a
ludicrous character of stereotypical proportions--his
weapon of choice? Well, since he spends most of his time
in prisons, he has a wide variety of homemade
"shanks" often found at any local penetentiary,
and he can be seen sticking them in everyone and
everything--including himself--as the movie progresses.
It is an original idea, but when you see him waving a
four inch icepick in the face of someone holding a nine
milimeter Uzi, it suddenly looses it's flair.
As for Sam Jackson's Shaft, he looks alot like Keenan
Ivory Wayans from "A Low Down Dirty Shame". As
the nephew of the original Shaft, he actually fails to
impress as much as Richard Roundtree who has a cameo in
the new film. Shaft does a lot of threatening...there's a
lot of talk without much follow through on his part. But
his preformance was as solid as it always is, it's not
his fault that there wasn't much to go on. Blame John
Singleton for that, a director who's only good film in
the past eight years was his debut "Boyz N the Hood."
My summary? Pay seven bucks for Shaft, and that's just
what you get--the shaft.

Related
Links:

|
|
 Still
the man, any questions?

![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/june/shaft01.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/june/shaft02.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/june/shaft03.jpg)
![[Image]](http://www.hundland.com/reviews/2000/june/shaft04.jpg)

|